Skip to Content
PUBLIC SECTOR
Back to overview/Inspections & enforcement

Inspect on risk, not on rotation.

Risk-based inspection planning, mobile field capture with photographs, violations and corrective notices, penalty processing and follow-up to verified closure.

The problem

Inspection capacity is always smaller than the population to be inspected. Rotating through the register treats a compliant holder and a repeat offender identically, which wastes the scarce resource.

Field capture on paper is the second constraint: a report typed up two days later loses the photograph, the timestamp and the evidentiary value that makes a penalty defensible.

Core workflow

Risk to verified closure.

01
Risk model
Prioritised by history, sector and complaint.
02
Schedule
Routed by area, inspector and capacity.
03
Field visit
Checklist, photos and location captured.
04
Finding
Compliant, violation or corrective notice.
05
Enforcement
Penalty, deadline and appeal route.
06
Closure
Re-inspection verifies correction.
What it covers

Planning

Risk-based prioritisationInspection schedulingInspector assignment and routesComplaint-driven inspectionCapacity and coverage planning

Field

Mobile checklistsPhoto and location evidenceOffline capture and syncOn-site notice issueInspector safety and log

Enforcement

Violation registerCorrective notices and deadlinesPenalty assessment and collectionAppeals and objectionsRepeat offender tracking
Operational outcomes
+34%
Violations found per inspection
On site
Report completed, not two days later
−41%
Penalties overturned on appeal
100%
Findings with photographic evidence

Ranges observed on Al Jawad engagements. Targets agreed in assessment.

Build a risk model for one inspection programme.

We rank your inspection population by risk and show the hit rate a targeted programme would achieve.