CONSTRUCTION ERP
The problem
Programmes are usually built once, approved, and then diverge quietly from what the site is doing. The schedule becomes a contractual artefact rather than an operating tool.
A schedule that is not updated from measured progress cannot support a delay claim, a recovery plan, or a resource decision.
Core workflow
Baseline to recovery.
01
Baseline
Approved programme with WBS, durations and dependencies.
02
Resource loading
Workforce, plant and subcontract fronts per activity.
03
Look-ahead
Three- and six-week plans issued to the site.
04
Actual progress
Updated from measured quantities, not from opinion.
05
Variance
Critical path impact, float consumed, delay attributed.
06
Recovery
Revised programme with the cost of acceleration shown.
What it covers
Planning
Gantt and network viewDependencies and constraintsCritical path and floatCalendars and shift patternsMulti-project resource view
Execution
Baseline vs. actual datesWeekly look-aheadProgress from measured quantityS-curve and earned valueDelay events register
Recovery
Revised and recovery programmesAcceleration cost impactExtension of time supportProgramme comparisonSchedule risk view
Connects with
Operational outcomes
+14 pts
Schedule adherence
Weekly
Programme updated from real quantities
−28%
Unattributed delay days
100%
Delay events with a dated record
Ranges observed on Al Jawad engagements. Targets agreed in assessment.